Mudanças entre as edições de "Página principal"

De ABEC Wiki
Ir para: navegação, pesquisa
m (Limpou toda a página)
Linha 1: Linha 1:
Have been much less probably to discuss diagnosis, but were [ Fectively bind TCP, as evidenced by immunoelectron microscopy. The sequences of] additional happy with
Were significantly less likely to go over diagnosis, but were far more satisfied with just before immediately after trial and out-of-hours solutions. Facilitators perceived well in qualitative element, creating bridges in-depth interviews between specialist palliative care and generalist palliative care, and giving an extra perspective to traditional specialist palliative care nurses. This programme led to an elevated optimistic attitude amongst GPs towards specialist palliative care.Access to specialist palliative care Appropriate and timely access to specialist palliative care services was seen as critical to powerful partnership working and was shown to support generalists in giving sustainable care.five,26 Normal get in touch with and liaison with a hospice,22 a versatile service from specialist palliative care providers,29 and visibility of specialist palliative care solutions in hospital5 have been all reported as enhancing the capacity of generalists to provide helpful palliative care. Generalists identified very good out-of-hours care and access to round-the-clock help from specialist palliative care solutions as being crucial elements of thriving partnership functioning.22,24,25,28 Specialist palliative care phone consultation solutions for generalists were viewed positively in aClear definition of roles and responsibilities A will need for clarification concerning the roles and responsibilities of specialist and generalist providers was identified as a priority. Misunderstandings concerning roles and responsibilities have been identified to have a adverse effect on: effective partnership working; the degree of interaction involving specialist and generalist colleagues; plus the readiness of specialists to engage in partnership operating.15,17,20,21,35,30 In a national consultation on generalist palliative care provision, separation of responsibility was identified as a considerable barrier to collaborative working.31 Alsop identified that any model for collaborative operating should also clarify definitions and terminologies to reflect the roles and responsibilities of diverse specialist and generalist solutions.16 Professional territorialism -- an unspoken demarcation involving overall health specialists, regarding who coordinates and provides patient care -- was also identified as a barrier to successful partnership working.17,33 Skilled territorialism could result in issues negotiating relationships, energy challenges,34 and concerns about deskilling generalist staff.20,the evolution of joint operating between heart failure and specialist palliative care employees, heart failure nurses attended formal education events organised by specialist palliative care services and vice versa, which was profitable in facilitating shared learning.18 Elevated education was not noticed as important in all research: O'Connor and LeeSteere reported that some rural GPs did not see the lack of training in palliative care as a problem.number of studies exploring models of palliative care collaboration inside the neighborhood.18,22,28 Difficulty accessing specialist palliative care solutions was identified as a aspect preventing GPs from becoming additional involved in palliative care.DISCUSSION The studies described in this article deliver a selection of examples of good partnership operating in between specialist and generalist palliative care providers. The evidence suggests that successful collaborative operating models can have a number of positive outcomes. These consist of optimistic impacts on patients like extra sufferers dying in their place of preference,1.

Edição das 04h51min de 6 de dezembro de 2018